How to Critique a Research Article
25 September, 2018 in Writing Prompts
visibility 1

Undertaking a literary review is not that easy as it may seem, as you should distinctively know the rules of how to critique a research article. Probably, you have already tried to look through your contemporaries’ writings and can’t understand what for they are performed.

How to Write a Critique Paper on a Research Article

Elaborating the process of revision may be a daunting tasks but it is worth it. But how to critique a quantitative research article if you lack knowledge on a subject or disagree with somebody’s findings. Bias may be, in fact, a huge problem for a reviewer. Completing a quantitative research article critique gives you a chance to examine its value and develop critical thinking.

What is an Article Critique

At first, you should get to know what a critique of a paper is. When defining the meaning of a term ‘critical evaluation’, we can state that it is a systematized method of investigating the trustworthiness of a paper and its findings.

How to Do an Article Critique

Getting started, we suggest you a step-by-step guide on how to write a good critique of an article critique. It might be quite puzzling when you do not know from what to start and to what pay attention. Here are some tips that would lead you in the process of reviewing:

Research Paper

The title of the work should be the most closely related to the content of a written piece. Its function is to light the sparkle of readers’ interest and to provoke further reading.

Keywords

This section should contain up to six words, which are the terms that uncover the major issues discussed in a research paper. To some extend keywords outline the skeleton of the entire paper.

Introduction

An introductory part should be a review of timely literature on the chosen topic. A writer should reflect the current theories and points of view of experts in a sphere. Some background facts should be also included, as a reader needs to be prepared to perceive the further information. The hypothesis is also an essential element of every introduction. Concluding this writing section, it should be announced why this research is important and what change could it make in a certain sphere of study or problem.

Materials and Methods

This section is as a document that shows a composition and specification of a paper. That is why it should conclude the concrete critique criteria, statistics applied, rates and other details. All together these facts demonstrate in which way this research has achieved its aims and what strategies were prioritized.

Results

Results should be statistically evaluated and interpreted in the way clear to a target reader. Additionally, there may be tables and graphs used to make information easier to comprehend and make vivid. Pay attention whether all the results are demonstrated in tables and whether there are no omissions. Percentages need to be used correctly. The data presented in graphs and tables should absolutely converge with the information mentioned in the text.

Discussion

In this part, an author is responsible for giving an insight into a real meaning of a paper. There is no need to present something new. In the discussion section, some theoretical concepts are duplicated as a background for new study interpretation. What is more, some problems and biases that could be faced on the way of a research need to be inspected.

Conclusions

This part summarizes the necessity and productiveness of the investigation. Moreover, it suggests the other ways to resolve the issue in the future.

References

All the references should be of relevance and currently topical.

Critiquing a research paper is a time-consuming and difficult task. It requires the maximum of your attention and persistence. Every single section should be carefully examined and evaluated.